L-IVF mhux kapriċċ: (3) Mill-friża għall-adozzjoni

Tkellimna fuq l-iffriżar.

Alternattiva Demokratika qed tgħid li min għal raġunijiet ta’ kuxjenza ma jaqbilx mal-iffriżar għandu jkollu d-dritt li juża l-IVF mingħajr iffriżar (opt-out etiku). Għandu jagħti struzzjonijiet lil konsulenti f’dan is-sens. Ovvjament il-konsulenti ser ikollhom diffikultá għax mhux trattament faċli.

Min jaċċetta l-iffriżar għandu ftit inqas diffikultajiet imma għandu ukoll responsabbiltá dwar x’ser jagħmel bl-embrijuni li eventwalment jiffurmaw. Li dawn jintużaw mill-koppja stess li tkun ipproduċiethom hi l-iktar soluzzjoni faċli. F’każ li jiġri hekk ma naħsibx li jkun hemm xi diffikultá. Anzi naħseb li tkun is-soluzzjoni idejali.

Il-problemi jibdew f’każ li l-embrijuni li qed jiffurmaw u li qegħdin fil-friża għal xi raġuni (tkun xi tkun) ma jintużawx. Il-Gvern fl-abbozz ta’ liġi qed jgħid li wara ħames snin dawn ikunu jistgħu jingħataw għall adozzjoni.

Il-proposta dwar l-adozzjoni tal-embrijuni mhiex proposta originali. Kienet saret f’rapport ta’ kumitat parlamentari li kien tmexxa mill-ħabib tiegħi t-Tabib Jean-Pierre Farrugia li kien mexxa kumitat parlamentari magħżul (Select Committee) dwar l-IVF fl-2010. Il-Membri Parlamentari l-ohra fil-kumitat kienu t-tobba Michael Farrugia (illum Ministru) u Frans Agius (MP minn Haż-Zabbar)

Din hi proposta li hi tajba fuq il-karta imma fil-prattika ftit tista’ taħdem għax min irid jaddotta m’hux qed jistenna l-IVF. Min imur għall-IVF jagħmel dan għax ikun jixtieq li l-wild ikun ġenetikament parti minnu. Naħseb li hi preferibbli addozzjoni normali milli addozzjoni mill-freezer tal-IVF għax tkun inqas problematika. Allura jkun iktar għaqli li l-koppji li jagħmlu użu mill-IVF jerfgħu huma stess ir-responsabbiltá sħiħa għall-embrijuni li qed jiffurmaw u li jitqegħdu fil-freezer. Dan minnu innifsu jnaqqas il-problema ta’ kumulu ta’ embrijuni li qed jiffurmaw fil-freezer.

Dan ovvjament ma jsolvix kull problema għax dejjem ser jibqa’ każi li dwarhom ma jkunx hemm qbil. Hu meħtieġ diskussjoni iktar fit-tul dwar x’jiġri mill-embrijuni qed jiffurmaw u li jitħallew fil-freezer.

Il-Gvern qed jgħaġġel iżżejjed. Hemm bżonn jieqaf ftit iktar u jisma’. L-abbozz jista’ jtejbu.

 

ikompli : (4) Surrogacy: sostituzzjoni tal-omm

Advertisements

L-IVF mhux kapriċċ: (2) Pluraliżmu Etiku

Min jikkritika l-IVF fit-totalitá tagħha, inkella aspetti partikolari biss, naħseb li jagħmel dan bi skopijiet tajba. Ikun jixtieq jaqsam magħna lkoll il-valuri “tajba” tiegħu jew tagħha.

Ovvjament nafu li ilu li spiċċa ż-żmien li naħsbu b’moħħ wieħed. Kulħadd illum jipprova jogħmod dak li jisma’ u jasal għall-konklużjonijiet tiegħu. M’aħniex differenti minn pajjiżi oħra f’dan. Bħala pajjiż għaddejjin minn process li pajjiżi oħra ilhom żmien twil li għaddew minnu. Illum il-ġurnata m’għadniex iżolati u allura r-ritmu tat-tibdil għaddej b’mod aċċelerat għax aħna influwenzati minn dak kollu li naraw u nisimgħu.

Kif ġara waqt id-dibattitu nazzjonali dwar ir-referendum li wassal għad-divorzju, kulħadd illum qed jirrealizza li f’pajjiżna l-pluralitá tmur lil hinn miċ-ċikkulata u t-toothpaste. Anke lil hinn mix-xandir. Illum nitkellmu ukoll dwar pluraliżmu etiku. Għandna fil-pajjiż valuri differenti, diversi drabi konfliġġenti, li jeżistu fostna fl-istess ħin. Huwa dan li jġib l-argumenti u li jagħlef id-dibattitu pubbliku u per konsegwenza jnissel il-ħtieġa ta’ bidla li tagħmilha possibli li dawn il-valuri jikkoeżistu.

L-argument ewlieni etiku huwa dwar meta tibda l-ħajja. Jekk tibdiex mal-konċepiment jew f’xi żmien ieħor. Dan hu argument li diġa ffaċċajnieh waqt id-dibattitu pubbliku dwar il-Morning After Pill.

Il-ħajja fir-realtá ma hiex switch li tixegħlu jew titfiegħ f’xi mument partikolari. M’hemmx mument partikolari imma hu process ta’ numru ta’ siegħat fejn wara li sseħħ il-fertilizzazzjoni (l-konċepiment) iċ-ċelluli li jirriżultaw jibdew jimmutiplikaw, jiżviluppaw u eventwalment tibda l-ħajja. F’dan il-mument ikun għad ma hemm l-ebda bniedem: għalhekk hu ġustifikabbli li tintuża l-Morning After Pill li twaqqaf il-proċess kollu. Għall-istess raġunijiet huwa ġustifikabbli l-iffriżar tal-embrijun li jkun qed jifforma. Fid-daqs dan ikun daqs ta’ tikka!

Dan hu l-argument kollu li dwaru hemm opinjonijiet differenti.

L-argument ikompli dwar x’jiġri wara li toħroġ l-embrijun li qed jifforma mill-friża. Jekk il-proċess ikompli m’hemmx problema. Imma jekk jieqaf, hemm min iħoss il-kuxjenza tniggżu għax jaħseb li jkun temm ħajja.

Huwa għal din ir-raġuni li Alternattiva Demokratika qed tgħid li min għal raġunijiet ta’ kuxjenza ma jaqbilx mal-iffriżar għandu jkollu d-dritt li juża l-IVF mingħajr iffriżar. Dan ovvjament jista’ jillimita is-suċċess tat-trattament tal-IVF. Imma min ikollu din id-diffikulta etika għandu kull dritt li japplika l-brejk fuq il-konsulenti li qed jagħtuh it-trattament.

Min-naħa l-oħra min m’għandu l-ebda diffikulta dwar l-iffriżar għandu jkollu kull dritt li jibbenefika ruħu mit-trattament sħiħ.

Din hi materja serja ħafna u qed nagħmlu tajjeb li qed niddiskutuha f’mod intens. Huwa sinjal posittiv anke bħala pajjiż.

 

ikompli : (3) Mill-friża għall-adozzjoni

L-IVF mhux kapriċċ: (1) In-natura tmexxina hi?

 

Ħadd ma jirrikorri għall-IVF b’kapriċċ. Kull koppja li tirrikorri għas-servizz tal-IVF tagħmel dan għax tkun muġugħa – tixtieq li jkollha l-ulied u ma jkunx possibli li dawn tnissilhom b’mod naturali.

L-IVF (in vitrio fertilisation) jista’ jipprovdi soluzzjoni, għax hu servizz favur il-ħajja billi jgħin lill-koppji fit-tnissil bl-użu tax-xjenza. Ix-xjenza tipprovdi dak li tkun qed iċċaħħad minnu n-natura.

Jeħtieġ iżda li dan is-servizz ikun użat b attenzjoni u b’responsabbilta. Għalhekk id-dibattitu pubbliku li hawn ġhaddej bħalissa, b’intensitá qawwija u emozzjonijiet kbar.

L-IVF ilu f’Malta. Sa ftit snin ilu kien offrut mis-settur privat li għamel flejjes kbar minn fuq il-miżerja tan-nies. Dan l-aħħar snin is-servizz twessa’ u beda joffrieh ukoll l-istat.

Għal snin, f Malta, l-istat ħalla lis-settur privat jagħmel li jrid. Ma kien hemm l-ebda forma ta’ regolamentazzjoni tas-settur. Nafu minn dikjarazzjonijiet pubbliċi li saru, li l-prattiċi addottati, diversi drabi wasslu għal tqala multipli u kull meta dan inqala’, s-settur privat tefa’ l-piz fuq l-isptar pubbliku għax is-settur privat ma kellux il-faċilitajiet neċessarji. Dan apparti l-kumplikazzjonijiet għal saħħet dawk kollha effettwati.

Hawn min hu kontra l-IVF fil-prinċipju, għax jidhirlu li għandna nħallu n-natura bi kwieta, tmexxina hi. Ovvjament dawn, meta jkunu ma jifilħux jaraw tabib u jieħdu l-medicini: lin-natura ma jħalluwiex tagħmel li trid. Jagħmlu ukoll l-operazzjonijiet jekk dawn ikunu meħtieġa, u jagħmlu tajjeb. Għax il-mediċina ġiet żviluppata biex tkun għas-servizz tal-bniedem. Għas-servizz tagħna lkoll.

L-istess l-IVF. B’differenza importanti għax fil-waqt li s-servizzi mediċi l-oħra jipproteġu l-ħajja, bl-IVF nissieħbu man-natura biex innisslu l-ħajja. Dan minnu innifsu jitfa’ responsabbiltá kbira fuq kull min imiss mal-IVF.

 

ikompli : (2) Pluraliżmu Etiku

By carmelcacopardo Posted in IVF Tagged

IVF: ir-riżervi ta’ Alternattiva Demokratika dwar il-proposti li saru

Alternattiva Demokratika il-bieraħ ippubblikat dokument bil-fehmiet tagħha dwar il-proposti tal-Gvern biex jestendi is-servizz tal-IVF.

Il-proposti li saru mill-Gvern jestendu l-faċiltá eżistenti tal-iffrizar minn waħda użabbli f’ċirkustanzi eċċezzjonali għal użu normali, ineħħu l-limitazzjoni konnessi mal-ġeneru għal aċċess għas-servizz, joħloq per konsegwenza d-dritt ta’ donazzjoni kemm tal-isperma mingħand raġel kif ukoll ta’ bajd mingħand mara kif ukoll jippermettu li jkun hemm min joffri ruħu bħala sostitut (surrogate) flok l-omm biex iġġorr it-tarbija waqt it-tqala.

Alternattiva Demokratika iddikjarat li taqbel mal-linji ġenerali tal-proposti imma għandha numru ta’ riżervi importanti dwar dak li qiegħed jiġi propost.

Fil-qosor id-dokument ta’ Alternattiva Demokratika jagħmel dawn l-osservazzjonijiet

  1. Għandna nirrispettaw il-pluralità ta’ valuri etiċi fil-pajjiż u għaldaqstant għandu jkun possibli li persuna li għal raġunijiet ta’ kuxjenza ma taċċettax l-iffriżar tal-embrijuni jkollha l-opinjoni tagħha rispettata u per konsegwenza jkun possibli li tagħmel użu mis-servizz tal-IVF b’din il-limitazzjoni, (opt-out etiku mill-iffrizar): dan id-dritt għandu jkun rikonoxxut minn stat lajk;
  2. Li f’kull ħin għandu jkun rispettat id-dritt tal-informazzjoni, kemm tal-persuna li ser tirċievi d-donazzjoni tal-isperma jew il-bajda kif ukoll ta’ kull wild li jirriżulta, id-dritt tal-informazzjoni jfisser li l-identità ta’ min ikun qed jagħmel id-donazzjoni għandha tkun magħrufa kemm lil min ikun ser jirċievi d-donazzjoni, kif ukoll lill-ulied ġġenerati meta dawn jagħlqu is-16-il sena: is-segretezza mhiex aċċettabbli;
  3. Li hu neċessarju li jsir screening tal-isperma u l-bajda għal mard trasmess ġenetikament;
  4. Nifhmu li s-surrogacy qed tkun proposta bil-kundizzjoni li dan ma jkunx kummerċjalizzat, però għadu mhux ċar kif dan ser isir għax ġaladarba jkun infetaħ il-bieb ser ikun diffiċli li jkun hemm kontrolli effettivi tal-kummerċjalizzazzjoni;
  5. Il-proposta tal-addozzjoni tal-embrijuni ma jidhirx li tista’ tkun implimentata u teħtieġ diskussjoni iktar profonda.

Fid-dawl ta’ dan għandha jkun emfasizzata l-ħtieġa li f’soċjetá li tħaddan il-pluraliżmu etiku nirrispettaw iktar l-opinjonijiet ta’ xulxin. Ovvjament, l-iktar mumenti fejn hu meħtieġ dan ir-rispett hu fejn il-fehmiet jikkuntrastaw: għax fejn dawn jaqblu ma hemm bżonn l-ebda sforz!

Huwa meħtieġ li ma jkunx hemm għaġġla żejda fid-diskussjoni pubblika. Il-Gvern qed jgħaġġel ħafna u mhux jagħti biżżejjed ċans lill-opinjoni pubblika biex tiddiġerixxi biżżejjed dak li qed ikun propost. Għad hemm diversi punti li jeħtieġu iktar ħsieb għax is-soluzzjonijiet proposti mhux ċari. Ikun għaqli għall-Parlament li jidħol f’iktar dettall dwar l-implikazzjonijiet tas- soluzzjonijiet proposti u dan billi fost oħrajn jitlob direttament hu l-assistenza ta’ esperti biex jgħinuh jindirizza xi difetti tal-proposti li qed jipproponi l-Gvern.

Alternattiva Demokratika tittama li l-Parlament jagħmel xogħolu sewwa. L-ebda mandat elettorali ma jagħti lill-Gvern is-setgħa li jagħmel li jrid. Tajjeb li niftakru li għalkemm diffiċli biex jitħaddmu jeżistu rimedji f’kaz li l-Parlament jonqos mill-jagħmel xogħolu sewwa.

The Planning Authority and its “principles”

Searching through the Strategic Plan for Environment and Development (SPED), the term “principle” is not found in any shape or form. We are slightly luckier if we conduct a similar search in the Development Planning Act (DPA) of 2016: there are three references to principles – guiding principles – which should be observed by the Maltese state in promoting a “comprehensive, sustainable, land use planning system”.

These guiding principles are briefly explained in article 3 of the 2016 DPA. Their objective is to enhance the quality of life for the benefit of present and future generations and is qualified by the standard Brundtland quote from her UN report Our Common Future: ” ………without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” That means that sustainability is included in the actual wording of the 2016 DPA. Actually, as we are all aware, this is lip-service in its worst form, because in real life we know full well that Malta’s Planning Authority does not seek the benefit of either the present or future generations.

Article 3 of the 2016 DPA lists various measures which need to be taken. They are specific and range from the need “to preserve, use and develop land and sea for this and future generations”, to ensuring that “planning policies are unambiguous”. Then Article 4 of the 2016 DPA states that we cannot go to a Court of Law to directly enforce the principles announced in the previous article, but, it is underlined that these principles are of a fundamental nature and have to be employed in the interpretation of planning law and policies.

This begs the question as to what extent the Planning Authority, as government’s land use planning agent, observes these basic principles and, in particular, whether the various planning policies in use are actually meant to enhance the quality of life of present and future generations.

There have been various political declarations that land use planning should be more friendly to developers, obviously assisting them to “make hay while the sun shines”. The developers, we are repeatedly told, need to be assured of reasonable expectations, as, poor fellows, they have to earn a living – even if this is at the expense of our quality of life.

As an example, may I ask to what extent is, for example, the Fuel Service Station Policy compatible with the basic principles that the Planning Authority is obliged to apply? In recent weeks I have written extensively about the matter because, to me, it is crystal clear that this Policy is not in any way compatible with the Planning Authority’s basic principles. In neither its present form, nor in the slightly diluted format proposed by the Environment and Resources Authority, does the Fuel Service Stations Policy respect the basic principles enshrined in the 2016 DPA.

The government knows this because, as far back as last September, it announced that “shortly” a public consultation exercise would commence on the manner of implementing a policy to ban cars having an internal combustion engine from being used on our roads.

After almost eight months, this “shortly” to be announced public consultation has still not commenced. The announcement that the public consultation would be announced “shortly” was not made by a new Minister, enthusiastic and overwhelmed by a difficult portfolio; it was made by Prime Minister Joseph Muscat in one of his Sunday sermons – the one delivered at the Rialto Bormla on 10 September 2017.

If we will not have cars on our roads running on petrol or diesel “shortly” why does the Planning Authority consider it necessary to permit more fuel service stations? It is certainly not in the interest of future generations.

The Planning Authority is entrusted to defend the interests of future generations. In my opinion it has failed in observing its brief as it has lost sight of its basic principles.

Published on the Malta Independent on Sunday : 22 April 2018

Il-proġett Daphne: istituzzjonijiet dgħajfa

Is-sitwazzjoni hi waħda gravi.

Il-qtil ta’ ġurnalista minnu innifsu hu tebgħa fuq il-pajjiż kollu.

Il-ħasil tal-flus, probabbilment ġejjin mill-korruzzjoni ta’ kobor li qatt ma rajna bħala, dejjem iktar jidher bħala l-possibli motiv f’dan kollu.

Il-kollass tal-istituzzjonijiet jgħaqqad kollox.

Il-ġurnalisti barranin investigaw huma ukoll. Għamlu ir-riflessjonijiet tagħhom fuq dak li semgħu, fuq dak li raw u fuq it-tweġibiet li ngħataw għall-mistoqsijiet tagħhom.

Għaliex, qed jistaqsu, ma ġie investigat l-ebda politiku Malti? Għaliex dawk li kitbet fuqhom DCG, l-ebda wieħed minnhom ma kien tal-inqas mistieden jieħu kafè mal-Kummissarju biex jgħin ftit lill-Pulizija fl-investigazzjoni tagħhom?

Qed jingħad li dawk li eventwalment ġew akkużati bil-qtil kienu avżati li l-Pulizija kienu ser jagħmlu raid fit-tinda tal-patata. Min qalilhom?

Dawn huma kollha affarijiet li jixħtu dellijiet kbar fuq il-proċess tal-ġustizzja fil-pajjiż.

L-istituzzjonijiet huma dgħajfa ħafna u m’għandna l-ebda kenn fihom.

The Environment Authority is becoming a sick joke

The current public debate about fuel stations is a wake-up call.

Earlier this week, the Environment and Resources Authority (ERA) produced a (sick) joke of a proposal which could reduce the maximum permissible size of a “new fuel station” to 2000 square metres from the current 3000 square metres.

The joke becomes a fully-fledged farce when Environment Minister Josè Herrera declared that the 14 pending applications for fuel stations will not be subject to the amended policy.

The ERA should have objected to the Fuel Stations Policy in principle, and come up with a proposal for a no-nonsense moratorium as, at this point in time, we do not need any more fuel stations. We have had more than enough compromise with only one net result: the further accelerated rape of the environment in Malta. With its proposal, the ERA has joined the queue of boot-lickers justifying the unjustifiable.

If, at some point in time, flesh is put on the bare-bones of the government declared policy of doing away with cars running on an internal combustion engine, we will need even fewer fuel stations – and eventually we will not need even one. So why does the ERA not take the bull by the horns and confront head-on the never-ending compromise that always finds some form of excuse in order to justify the rape of our environment?

For some that may be wishful thinking but it is, however, the only way forward.

Once upon a time we had a National Sustainable Development Strategy. It was drafted after an extensive exercise in public consultation and carried out after considerable in-depth discussions between all the relevant stakeholders. The public sector and the private sector, as well as the voluntary sector, were all involved.

This strategy produced a blueprint for action which was, unfortunately, generally ignored.

Among the issues addressed in the National Sustainable Development Strategy was that of sustainable mobility: an integrated transport strategy encompassing sustainable mobility is required that takes into consideration efficiency in transporting people, the protection of the environment, the promotion of public health and safety, and social inclusion.

What does ‘sustainable mobility’ mean? Put simply, it is the model that enables movement with minimal territorial and environmental impact: planning our mobility requirements such that negative impacts are the least possible.

We need to address the causes of the current transport policy mess and not tinker with the effects. Rather then playing about with fly-overs and tunnels, the Ministry for Transport needs to address the issue of car-ownership: the cause of the mess. Instead of initiating measures to reduce the number of cars on Malta’s roads from the current staggering figure, Malta’s Ministry of Transport is determined to make it easier for cars to keep increasing their dominance of those roads.

The infrastructural projects to ease traffic congestion at Kappara and Marsa, or the proposed Santa Luċija tunnels, for example, will only serve to increase the capacity of our roads – which means more cars on our roads. Traffic congestion may be addressed in the short term by these infrastructural projects, but they will, however, also increase the traffic on our roads, until another flyover or another tunnel is deemed necessary!

This shifts the problem to the future, when it will be much worse and more difficult to address.

The government is acting like an overweight individual who ‘solves’ the problem of his expanding wasteline by changing his wardrobe instead of going on a painful but necessary diet.

Within this context the Fuel Stations Policy serves the purpose of ensuring the servicing of an ever-increasing number of cars on our roads. Who is benefitting from such a policy? If this madness is not stopped, there is no way we will – as a country – be in a position to implement the declared policy of reducing from our roads vehicles running on internal combustion engines.

As a result, we will not be honouring our commitment to decarbonise the economy.

The Planning Authority has lost sight of its mission statement long ago. Unfortunately, the Environment and Resources Authority has followed in its footsteps.

 

Published in The Malta Independent on Sunday : 15 April 2018

L-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar tinkoraġixxi l-ispekulazzjoni tal-art

L-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar qed toħroġ il-permessi ta’ żvilupp għall-pompi tal-petrol u d-dijsil ħierġin bħall-pastizzi.

Xi xhur ilu, f’diskors li għamel il-Prim Ministru kien qal li l-Gvern immexxi minnu jaqbel li karozzi li jaħdmu bil-petrol jew bid-dijsil għandhom jispiċċaw mit-toroq Maltin. Nhar l-10 ta’ Settembru 2017 Joseph Muscat kien ħabbar li l-Gvern kien fi ħsiebu li “dal-waqt” jagħti bidu għal konsultazzjoni pubblika biex ikun stabilit meta u kif għandha tkun implimentata din il-politika li bħala riżultat tagħha jkunu jistgħu jinxtraw biss karozzi li jaħdmu bl-elettriku jew karozzi simili.

Għaddew seba’ xhur u għadna qed nistennew li jibda dan il-proċess ta’ konsultazzjoni pubblika. Sadanittant, aħna u nistennew, l-ispekulaturi tal-art, bl-għajnuna tal-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar għaddejjin xalata: jippjanaw kif jirrovinaw iktar raba’, 3000 metru kwadru kull darba, u dan biex jibnu pompi li ftit ieħor mhux ser ikollna bżonn. Imbagħad x’nagħmlu bl-art li tkun diġa ġiet rovinata?

Alternattiva Demokratika taqbel li m’għandniex ħtieġa ta’ karozzi li jaħdmu bil-petrol u d-dijsil fit-toroq tagħna. Fil-fatt kienet Alternattiva Demokratika, bil-ħsieb li tintlaħaq il-mira strateġika ta’ Karbonju Żero fil-gżejjer Maltin li fil-Manifest Elettorali ta’ l-aħħar elezzjoni ġenerali poġġiet quddiem l-elettorat din il-proposta speċifika: li fi żmien 20 sena, ċjoe sal-2037, għandhom jispiċċaw il-karozzi kollha li jaħdmu bil-petrol u d-dijsil mit-toroq Maltin. Alternattiva Demokratika kienet l-uniku partit politiku f’Malta li kien ċar fuq dan f’Malta sa minn qabel l-elezzjoni ġenerali.

Id-dikjarazzjoni tal-Prim Ministru tal-10 ta’ Settembru 2017 kellha twassal għall-konklużjoni loġika li m’għandniex bżonn ta’ iktar pompi tal-petrol u d-dijsil. Kien ikun floku kieku tħabbar moratorju immedjat. Fil-fatt messna qegħdin ngħoddu l-ġranet li neħilsu darba għal dejjem mill-karozzi li jaħdmu bil-petrol u d-dijsil. Bħala riżultat ta’ dan messu hu ovvju li fil-futur qarib m’hu ser ikollna bżonn l-ebda pompa tal-petrol jew dijsil: dawn għandhom jonqsu mit-80 li għandna illum sa xejn u dan meta tkun implimentata b’mod sħiħ il-politika mħabbra mill-Prim Ministru u li dwarha ilna 7 xhur nistennew il-konsultazzjoni pubblika.

M’għandniex bżonn ta’ pompi ġodda: imma għandna bżonn li jagħlqu l-pompi li ġja hawn mingħajr ma jinħolqu oħrajn flokhom. L-20 sena proposti minn Alternattiva Demokratika fil-manifest elettorali tal-2017 biex jispiċċaw mit-toroq Maltin karozzi li jaħdmu bil-petrol jew bid-dijsil kienu meqjusa raġjonevoli, suffiċjenti u fl-istess direzzjoni ta’ deċiżjonijiet politiċi simili li ittieħdu minn pajjiżi oħra. Dan hu żmien biżżejjed biex tkun żviluppata l-infrastruttura nazzjonali meħtieġa għall-karozzi li jaħdmu bl-elettriku. Hu ukoll biżżejjed biex dawk li għandhom dawn it-tip ta’ karozzi jibdew jidraw ftit l-iżvilupp ta’ din ir-realtá ġdida bla petrol jew dijsil.

Bosta pajjiżi oħra diġa ddeċidew, inkella qegħdin fil-proċess li jiddeċiedu li fit-toroq tagħhom ma jkollhomx iktar karozzi li jaħdmu bil-petrol jew bid-dijsil. Dawn jinkludu in-Norveġja u l-Olanda (it-tnejn sal-2025), il-Ġermanja (sal-2030), Franza, r-Renju l–Indja u ċ-Ċina (lkoll sal-2040). Ma jdumx ma jkun hemm oħrajn ukoll.
L-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar qegħda tkompli tinjora dan l-iżvilupp importanti fil-politika tal-pajjiż billi tibqa’ għaddejja bl-applikazzjoni tal-politika imsejħa 2015 Fuel Service Stations Policy b’mod robotiku. Din il-politika dwar il-pompi tal-petrol u d-dijsil tippermetti qies massimu permissibli ta’ 3000 metru kwadru imma l-Awtoritá qatt ma qieset li kien neċessarju li tordna tnaqqis fil-qies tal-proposti li kellha quddiema. Għax kollha kellhom il-qies massimu ta’ 3000 metru kwadru. Bħala riżultat ta’ dan l-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar flok għal pompi qed toħroġ permessi għal żoni massiċċi kummerċjali barra miż-żona tal-iżvilupp.

Din hi l-agħar forma ta’ spekulazzjoni tal-art u f’dan il-kaz it-tort hu unikament tal-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar. L-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar hi ta’ theddida għall-ġenerazzjonijiet futuri. Dan hu l-punt li għamlu ż-żgħażagħ mill-Moviment Graffiti u l-Kamp Emerġenza Ambjent meta nhar il-Ħamis ipprotestaw u ħarbtu laqgħa tal-Bord tal-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar waqt li dan kien qiegħed jikkunsidra applikazzjoni għall-pompa ġdida tal-petrol u d-dijsil f’Ħal-Luqa.

Għandna Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar li hi ala bieba mill-ambjent u mill-kwalitá tal-ħajja. Bil-provi.

 

 

The Planning Authority encourages land speculation

Development permits for fuel stations are being approved left, right and centre by the Planning Authority.

Some months ago,  in a speech made in public, the Prime Minister said that the Government agrees that use of petrol and diesel cars should be phased out and that, in future, all cars should be electric. On the 10 September 2017, Joseph Muscat announced that government would “shortly” be launching a consultation on “setting a cut-off date beyond which all new car purchases would have to be electric or similar vehicles.”

Seven months have elapsed, and we are still waiting for the consultation exercise to be launched. And while we wait, land speculators (with the Planning Authority’s assistance) are in festive mood, plotting the ruin of 3000 square metres at a time to develop fuel stations that we will shortly not need any more. And what will be done with the spoiled land then?

Alternattiva Demokratika agrees with the proposal to establish a cut-off date for cars that run on petrol and diesel. Indeed in its manifesto at the last general election,  with a strategic zero carbon future for the Maltese Islands in mind, it put forward this specific proposal to the electorate: that internal combustion engine cars should be off our roads in 20 years time, that is by 2037. Alternattiva Demokratika was the only political party in Malta that took this clear stand before the general election.

In view of the Prime Minister’s declaration of the 10 September 2017, the logical conclusion is that new fuel stations are not required. An immediate moratorium would be in order and, in fact, we should be on the eve of the start of a countdown that would rid us of cars that run on petrol or diesel. Consequently, there will be no need for fuel stations in the not too distant future: reducing from the current 80 to none, when the phase-out – which is still subject to public consultation – is fully implemented.

We do not need new fuel stations: what we need is that existing fuel stations are closed down without their being replaced. The 20-year time-frame proposed by Alternattiva Demokratika in its 2017 electoral manifesto was considered to be reasonable, sufficient and in line with similar policy decisions taken in other countries. This time-frame was deemed sufficient to develop the required national infrastructure for electric-powered cars. It was also deemed to be a reasonable length of time to permit those who own vehicles running on internal combustion engines to adjust to the development of a new reality without petrol or diesel.

Various other countries have decided on – or are considering – the elimination of internal combustion engine driven vehicles from their roads. These include Norway and the Netherlands (both by 2025), Germany (by 2030), France, the United Kingdom, India and China (all by 2040). Others will soon follow.

The Planning Authority continues to ignore this policy development by applying the 2015 Fuel Service Stations Policy robotically. This policy establishes a maximum permissible size of 3000 square metres but the Authority did not consider it appropriate to scale down any of the proposals submitted for its consideration as all the approved stations cover the maximum size possible. As a result, the Planning Authority is churning out permits for massive commercial areas outside the development zone.

This is land speculation at its worst and the Planning Authority has no one to blame but itself and is a threat to future generations. This is the point made by the protestors from Graffiti and Kamp Emerġenza Ambjent last Thursday, when they stormed a Planning Authority Board meeting considering a development application for a new fuel station at Luqa.

We have a Planning Authority which doesn’t give two hoots about the environment and our quality of life.

 

Published in The Malta Independent on Sunday : 8 April 2018

 

L-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar : ABZ mill-ambjent

 

Għamlu tajjeb il-Moviment Graffiti u l-Kamp Emergenza Ambjent li ipprotestaw waqt laqgħa tal-Bord tal-istess Awtoritá u wasslu biex il-laqgħa li kienet qed tikkonsidra l-ħruġ ta’ permess għall-pompa oħra tal-petrol titħassar.

Il-permessi għall-pompi tal-petrol ħerġin bħall-pastizzi. Ma għandiex bżonn pompi tal-petrol ġodda. Li għandna bżonn u li jibdew jagħlqu dawk li hawn mhux li jiftħu l-ġodda.

Xi xhur ilu l-Prim Ministru kien iddikjara li l-Gvern jaqbel li jispiċċaw mit-toroq Maltin karozzi li jaħdmu bil-petrol u bid-diesel u li fil-futur il-karozzi kollha jkunu jaħdmu preferibilment bl-elettriku.

Alternattiva Demokratika taqbel ma dan tant li dan kien ġie propost fil-Manifest Elettorali ta’ AD fl-aħħar elezzjoni ġenerali : l-unika partit politiku li ħa din il-posizzjoni ċara qabel l-elezzjoni.

Il-politika li biha l-permessi għall-pompi tal-petrol ħerġin bħall-pastizzi hi għodda għall-ispekulazzjoni tal-art u l-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar flimkien mal-Gvern u l-Opposizzjoni huma kompliċi f’din l-ispekulazzjoni.

Għalhekk l-Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar mhiex serja, qed tagħmel il-ħsara lill-ġenerazzjonijiet futuri. Ghandna Awtoritá tal-Ippjanar li hi ABZ mill-ambjent.