Ngħinu lill-Griegi jiksbu d-dinjità ta’ pajjiżhom lura

Malta-Greece

Il-vot LE tal-Griegi l-bieraħ qabel kollox hu vot ta’pajjiż favur id-dinjità tiegħu. Huwa vot ta’ poplu li qed jara lill-pajjiżu jikkollassa biċċa biċċa. Huwa vot favur il-pensjonijiet li qed jisparixxu. Huwa vot favur l-isptarijiet u l-mediċini, vot favur li fl-aħħar tax-xahar il-gvern Grieg ikun jista’ jħallas il-pagi tiegħu. Huwa vot kontra l-awsterità.

Dan kollu jfisser li hemm bżonn jingħata iktar piz lill-fatt li s-solidarjetà ma kienitx preżenti biżżejjed fit-taħditiet bejn il-Gvern Grieg u t-troika [il-fond Monetarju Internazzjonali, il-Bank Ċentrali Ewropew u l-Kummissjoni Ewropeja]. Il-Greċja waslet fejn hi għax kulħadd għalaq għajnejħ għal snin twal għall-korruzzjoni w it-tberbiq u fl-aħħar wasal iż-żmien tal-kontijiet. Żmien li jasal fuq kulħadd.

Imma sfortunatament il-piz tal-awsterità ma ntrefax minn min berbaq jew minn min ħa sehem fil-korruzzjoni. Dawk kollha, bħal dejjem issa sparixxew.

It-triq il-quddiem hi waħda li twieżen lill-fqir u li tirfed l-istat biex jibqa’ jiffunzjona u jkun jista’ jibqa’ jservi lill-batut u lil min jiddependi mis-solidarjetà soċjali ankè biex sempliċement jeżisti.

Fid-dawl ta’ dan kollu d-deċiżjonijiet m’humiex faċli. L-ovvju hu li d-djun tal-Greċja mhux ser jitħallsu, la fil-futur qarib u probabbilment l-anqas iktar fil-bogħod. L-obbligu tal-Unjoni Ewropeja għaldaqstant (inkluż l-obbligu tal-Gvern Malti) hu li l-Gvern Grieg ikun mgħejjun jibni l-pajjiż mill-ġdid. It-triq m’hiex faċli għax il-prijorità m’għandhomx ikunu l-flus imma n-nies.

Nittamaw li fil-ġranet li ġejjin tinstab soluzzjoni, mibnija fuq is-solidarjetà, mhux fuq l-awsterità.

Advertisements

Addressing the environmental deficit

Environment

 

The environmental deficit is constantly on the increase. Each generation creates additional  environmental impacts without in any way adequately addressing the accumulated impacts handed down by the previous generation.

Governments are worried by economic deficits yet few seem to be worried by the accumulated -and accumulating – environmental deficit. We are using the earth’s resources as if tomorrow will never come.

The Living Planet report published regularly by the World Wildlife Fund, demonstrates how the demands made by humanity globally exceed the planet’s biocapacity. In fact,  each year we consume 50% more than what  is produced by the planet.

The ecological footprint, that is the impact which each country has on the earth’s resources, varies geographically. On a global level, the average ecological footprint of a human being is 1.7 hectares. Malta’s ecological footprint has been calculated at around 3.9 hectares per person, more than double the global average. This adds up to an impact of around 50 times the area of the Maltese Islands.

Put simply, this means that in order to satisfy the needs of  each and every person in Malta  we are, in fact, utilising land in other countries.  In fact we import most of our requirements from other countries, thereby using their natural resources. We use  their air, their land, their water and their natural resources.

The politics of sustainable development seeks to view  and address these impacts holistically. It also considers today’s impacts  in the light of tomorrow’s needs and seeks to ingrain a sense of responsibility in decision-making. It does this by addressing the root causes of the environmental deficit.

Sustainable development policy understands that Maltese roads are bursting at the seams. We have reached a situation where improving the road network will improve neither connectivity nor the quality of the air we breath.  Malta’s small size should have made it easy ages ago to have excellent connectivity through public transport, with better air quality as a bonus. But it was ignored.

A sustainable water policy in Malta would have dictated better utilisation of rainwater. Instead, we spend millions of euros- including a chunk of EU funds- to ensure that instead of collecting rainwater we channel it straight into the Mediterranean Sea, only to harvest seawater  immediately through our reverse osmosis  plants. To make matters worse, we treat wastewater before dumping it into the sea when, with some extra thought (and expense) it would have been put to much better use.

Sustainable development embedded in our land use policy would lead to a substantial reduction in the land available for development and certainly to a strict ODZ protection protocol. Instead, we are faced with a situation resulting in a high number of vacant properties coupled with a nonchalant attitude to developing more agricultural land, as if we had a lot to spare!

The environmental deficit which has been accumulating over the years places us in a very precarious position as we cannot keep living on ecological credit for long.   Excessive ecological credit will inevitably lead to ecological bankruptcy from which neither the EU nor the International Monetary Fund will be able to bail us out.  The only solution is taking our environmental responsibilities seriously, before it is too late.

published in the Malta Independent on Sunday, 7 June 2015