Manoel Island: one step forward

The controversy on the future of Manoel Island has been going on for ages.

The citizen’s action some 18 months ago led by eNGO Kamp Emergenza Ambjent and publicly supported by the Gżira Mayor Conrad Borg Manchè as well as various eNGOs led to the current breakthrough with MIDI, as a result of which common sense will be given the opportunity to prevail.

The setting up of the Manoel Island Foundation with environmentalist Claire Bonello as chair is a landmark decision. It does not signify agreement with what has been done to date but rather a determination that in the future, if we put our heads together, we can possibly avoid past mistakes. In time, perhaps, we can also seek to reverse some of the mistakes carried out so far.

When, together with countless others, I joined the protest at Manoel Island 18 months ago, I had one objective in mind: that access to the open spaces and the foreshore of Manoel Island belonged to all of us. There was an urgent need that this access be claimed back and subsequently guaranteed. This has now been done.

The Guardianship agreement focus specifically on the public’s right of access which right has always been in existence even though MIDI did its best to obstruct its use over the years. MIDI has (at last) bound itself to respect such a right of access and together with the Gżira Local Council has spelled out the details on how this can be reasonably exercised. The efforts put in by all environmentalists bore fruit such that MIDI clearly understood that it could no longer avoid the negotiating table. It risked further reputational damage which it could ill-afford.

The cynics among us correctly maintain that there is nothing for which to thank MIDI that has after all obstructed the public’s right of access for so many years! They are of course right, but it is time to move on to the next challenges. We move forward incrementally, one small step at a time.

The Guardianship agreement seeks to address two diametrically opposed positions: the Gżira community’s right of access as supported by the environmental lobby on the one hand and the MIDI development rights granted by Parliament in the 1990s on the other hand.

One can argue until eternity that Malta’s Parliament was irresponsible when it unanimously approved the motion granting development rights to MIDI over the Tigne peninsula and Manoel Island. I still hold that same view. No Green could ever support such a Parliamentary motion, not even with the restoration sugar-coating obligations woven into the agreed concession.

Given that Parliament has no political will to reverse the 1990s decision and take Manoel Island back into public ownership, the Gżira Local Council, supported by eNGOs was right to seek and arrive at the Guardianship agreement. The agreement fills a void which Parliament and government could not even understand, and consequently could not address.

A price had to be paid for the Guardianship agreement to be concluded. This was the acceptance, subject to the provisions of the agreement, of the Manoel Island Masterplan and commitment on the part of those around the negotiating table not to oppose or object to its implementation. I think that this is the point of contention brought forward by those who disagree with the Guardianship agreement. This might be considered a high price to pay. However, it must be pointed out that the agreement contains a number of limitations on the Masterplan’s implementation and grants the Manoel Island Foundation a legal basis to halt the commercialisation of the foreshore or the green open spaces.

Alternattiva Demokratika considers the Guardianship agreement to be a positive step forward as it addresses the pressing issue of access based of a realistic appraisal of the situation. Gżira Local Council and the eNGOs involved are to be applauded for their determination in reaching this goal. Moreover, the Guardianship agreement does not exclude the possibility that in future, a responsible Parliament would seriously consider taking all of Manoel Island back into public ownership. It should however be noted that only a green MP can guarantee that the matter makes it to Parliament’s agenda. The others are too “business friendly” to even consider the matter.

 

published in The Malta Independent on Sunday : 1st April 2018

Advertisements

Il-klijenti ta’ Victor Axiak u Timothy Gambin

Delimara EIA contents

 

Fl-artiklu tagħha tal-bieraħ il-Ħadd fuq is-Sunday Times intitolat Of hats and despicability, Claire Bonello identifikat problema oħra kbira konnessa mal-proċess tal-permessi tat-torrijiet tal-Imrieħel u Tas-Sliema (Townsquare).

Victor Axiak u Timothy Gambin fil-passat riċenti kellhom fost il-klijenti tagħhom lill-gruppi ta’ Gasan u ta’ Tumas li jiffurmaw parti mill-konsortium li twaqqaf għall-Power Station tal-Gass f’Delimara. Għalihom Victor Axiak u Timothy Gambin għamlu xogħol li kien jikkonsisti fi studji dwar impatti ambjentali ta’ dak il-proġett. Axiak dwar l-ekoloġija marittima u Gambin dwar l-arkejoloġija marittima. Ir-ritratt ta’ hawn fuq juri paġna mir-rapport tal-EIA dwar il-power station li taħdem bil-gass f’Delimara bl-ismijiet ta’ Axiak u Gambin u l-oqsma li rrappurtaw dwarhom.

Il-mistoqsija ċara hi jekk hux etiku li Axiak u Gambin jieħdu sehem f’laqgħat tal-Awtorità tal-Ippjanar li fihom jagħtu l-opinjoni u jiddeċiedu dwar applikazzjonijiet tal-klijenti tagħhom.

Axiak ma attendiex għal uħud mil-laqgħat. Imma la hu u l-anqas Gambin ma ħassew il-ħtieġa li jgħidu li għandhom xi konflitt ta’ interess. Din x’serjetà hi?

L-imġieba korretta mhiex qegħda għall-politiċi biss iżda ukoll għal kull min hu involut fit-teħid ta’ deċiżjonijiet.

Ir-Rapport tal-AD dwar l-elezzjoni ta’ Marzu 2008

 

 

 

Dal-għodu ġie ppubblikat ir-rapport li jiena flimkien ma Claire Bonello u Kurt Sansone ħejjejna dwar il-mod kif ħadmet Alternattiva Demokratika matul l-elezzjoni tal-2008.

 

Mhux ser noqgħod nikkummenta fuq dak li hemm miktub. Dak jista’ jinqara minn kulħadd li huwa ukoll liberu biex jikkummenta favur jew kontra jew b’żieda ma dak li kkonkludejna fir-rapport.

 

L-opinjoni ta’ kulħadd għandha piż.

 

Dan ir-rapport ġie ippreżentat minni lill-Eżekuttiv ta’ AD nhar l-Erbgħa fil-għaxija li mill-ewwel iddeċieda li għandu jkun pubbliku.

 

 

Għandu jkollna l-umilta’ li neżaminaw bir-reqqa dak li sar u kif dan fil-futur jista’ isir aħjar. Għandu jkollna l-umilta’ li nisimgħu x’għandu xi jgħid ħaddieħor. Għandu jkollna ukoll l-umilta’ li nieħdu l-passi korrettivi meħtieġa.

 

Meta bħal-lum ġimgħa, nhar is-Sibt 14 ta’ Ġunju tiltaqa’ l-Laqgħa Ġenerali tal-AD l-ewwel ser tiddiskuti dan ir-rapport. Imbagħad taħtar it-tim li jrid imexxi lill-AD għas-snin li ġejjin.

 

Minkejja li bil-fors irridu naslu għal konklużjonijiet dwar kif għandna ntejjbu l-operat tal-AD fil-futur f’dan il-mument kritiku huwa ukoll floku ringrazzjament lil Harry Vassallo li tant iddedika minn ħinu w l-enerġija tiegħu matul dawn l-aħħar 18-il sena biex jara l-viżjoni tal-AD tiġi addottata u timxi l-quddiem.

 

Sar ħafna progress. Iżda mhux biżżejjed.

 

Għada jinbena fuq illum.

 

Grazzi.

KONSULTAZZJONI – Agħti l-opinjoni tiegħek

adsmall.gif

L-Eżekuttiv ta’ Alternattiva Demokratika – The Green Party iddeċieda li jaħtar kummissjoni biex teżamina r-riżultat li kisbet l-AD fl-elezzjoni ġenerali tal-ġimgħa l-oħra. Il-kummissjoni hi mistennija li teżamina l-ħidma u l-mod kif tiffunzjona l-AD u tipproponi tibdil u titjib fejn jirriżulta meħtieġ. Dan in vista ta’ l-isfidi elettorali li jmiss.

Tista’ tibgħat is-sottomissjonijiet tiegħek bl-email: alternattiva2008@yahoogroups.com 

Il-Kummissjoni ser tkun komposta kif ġej :

Il-Perit Carmel Cacopardo (Rapporteur)

Is-Sur Kurt Sansone, gurnalist

Dr. Claire Bonello, Avukat.