A position of trust


Government has just announced that it has appointed 14 Permanent Secretaries. Three of the appointees have already served under the previous administration. The others are new to the post.

Within twenty four hours from Labour’s election to office, Prime Minister Joseph Muscat announced the appointment of a designate Head of the Civil Service. In line with Lawrence Gonzi’s appointments the said designate Head of the Civil Service was also appointed simultaneously as Principle Permanent Secretary at the Office of the Prime Minister and Secretary to the Cabinet.

Within hours rumours announced that all Permanent Secretaries had been requested to submit their resignations which, it was stated, were necessary and in line with normal practice in a democratic society.

It  was not however stated that the real issue with the post of Permanent Secretary is that it is a position of trust. All those appointed were so appointed because the previous administration considered that they could be trusted. Knowing some if not most of the appointees I can say that the trust demonstrated by the previous administration in the appointment of its Permanent Secretaries was most probably based on a cocktail of considerations.  Their administrative abilities undoubtedly featured prominently on the list. There were undoubtedly other issues. Given the sensitivity of the posts I have no doubt that political loyalty was given some weight in the appointments made. In some cases more than others.

The posts of Permanent Secretaries are not the only posts which the Gonzi administration considered as positions of trust.  I remember clearly the reports drawn up by former MEPA Audit Officer on the appointment of the Director for Environment Protection at MEPA and MEPA’s  CEO without issuing a call for applications. The MEPA Audit Officer had then argued that there was no need to consider such posts as positions of trust meriting direct appointment. Subjecting them to a public competition through an open call for applications would have been fair and proper.

A number of public corporations and authorities have appointed their senior management, primarily CEOs, through either an open call or else through a direct appointment. In view of the fact that the Public Administration Act has not been brought into force there is no enforceable rule to ensure a clear demarcation line as to which posts in the wider civil service are to be deemed as positions of trust and which not.

It is logical for persons appointed to positions of trust to make way when those who appointed them are no longer in authority. But then in a micro-state as Malta, where each and every one of us is known to one and all, it is in my view essential that the positions in the wider civil service which are deemed to be “positions of trust” are to be the minimum possible number.  It does not make sense to have a large number of such posts.

Unfortunately this matter has never been discussed. What is government’s position on the matter?

It is about time that all the cards are on the table.

3 comments on “A position of trust

  1. I completely agree with you. This government is carrying too much weight around simply to say thank you for those who helped out at the election. Is the financial position of Malta in a better state than we were told or is JM going mad and spend, spend, spend as if there is no tomorrow? In all this and he has not started sending new Charge’ d’Affaires abroad yet!

  2. Ghaziz Perit Carmel Caccopardo,

    Inti, fil-blog tieghek ktibt dwar il-hatriet diretti fis-servizz civili mill-Politici. Dan jien ma naqbilx mieghu. Nahseb li dan ix-xenarju ilna narawh mill-Indipendenza ta’ Malta ‘l hawn. Ma jistax ikun li l-politiku jibqa jahtar postijiet u jdahhal nies direttament hu fis-servizz civili. Jien nemmen fil-meritokrazija u din ghandha tithaddem f’kull sfera ta’ postijiet, minbarra dawk il-karigi msemmija fil-Kostituzzjoni – bhal ma huma Avukat Generali, il-Gudikatura, l-Ombudsman, l-Awditur Generali u xi kariga ohra – nemmen li ghandu jkun il-poplu li jelegihom f’elezzjoni hielsa u demokratika. Il-bqija, jigifieri mis-Segretarju permaneni sa l-anqas messaggier, nemmen li ghandu jkun hemm ezami BIL-MIKTUB BISS biex jinhatru dawn in-nies u b’hekk ma narawx Knisja tizzarma sabiex tinbena ohra kull darba li jkollna bidla fl-amministrazzjoni politika tal-pajjiz.

    • Hemm hafna sens f’dak li qed tikteb Joseph. Imma ma nahsibx li hu korrett li jinghad li m’ghandux ikun hemm hatriet politici.

      Tali hatriet izda ghandhom ikunu l-inqas possibli fin-numru. U ghandu jkun car ukoll li min jinhatar bi kriterji politici (position of trust) ghandu jwarrab immedjatament meta jispicca min ikun hatru.

      Mill-bqija huwa importanti li niddiskutu dawn il-materji bis-serjeta’ kbira mehtiega. Il-Gvern qatt ma jiddiskuti dawn l-affarijiet ghax irid izomm il-poter assolut. L-Opposizzjoni tikkritika l-inqas possibli ghax tittama li meta ddur il-folja tkun hi li jkollha f’idejha dan il-poter assolut.

      It-taxxi bhas-soltu jaghmlu tajjeb!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s