Blog ta' Carmel Cacopardo

Lenti fuq ir-rewwixta: 3) Il-ġarra ġejja w sejra

carmelcacopardo — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:34:56 +0000

Uħud qed jgħidulna li ħadd m’hu ikbar mill-partit. Jgħidulna hekk biex ifissru li l-Membri Parlamentari għandhom ibaxxu rashom għat-tmexxija meta jitkellem il-Leader.

Il-Partit hu kbir skond kemm jirrispetta lill-membri tiegħu. Kemm jirrispetta l-liberta’ tal-ħsieb tagħhom. Dan ir-rispett jintwera mhux fil-konfront ta’ min jikkonforma ruħu iżda fil-konfront ta’ min hu kritiku. Għax ngħiduha kif inhi, x’mertu hemm li tirrispetta lil min jaqbel miegħek? Hemm il-mertu fir-rispett meta dan tesprimieh fil-konfront ta’ min jikkritikak!

Il-kritika b’mod partikolari meta tkun kostruttiva ssaħħa kemm lil min jagħmilha kif ukoll lil min għandu l-paċenzja li jiftaħ widnejn u mhux biss jisma’ iżda fuq kollox jagħti każ. Nikbru meta nikkonfrontaw l-ideat u nevitaw il-paroli vojt u l-insulti fil-konfront ta’ min għandu ideat differenti.

Nies b’moħħ magħluq ser jibqgħu jeżistu. Dawn jikkundannaw lil min ma jaqbilx magħhom għal dik li b’mod dispreggjattiv isejħu l-miżbla tal-istorja. Għalihom għandek valur biss meta taqbel magħhom. Il-bqija m’int xejn.

Dawn huma l-egħruq tar-rewwixta.

Ir-rewwixta hi r-riżultat ta’ Partit li jisma’ imma ma jagħtix każ, b’mod partikolari b’mod repetut.

Kif ngħidu l-ġarra ġejja w sejra fl-aħħar tinkiser.

Lenti fuq ir-rewwixta : 2) Lealta’ tal-lastku

carmelcacopardo — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:19:22 +0000

Meta nitkellmu dwar dak li għaddej bħalissa fil-Parlament id-diffikulta għall-pubbliku hi jekk il-Membru Parlamentari jaqbiżx il-linja immaġinarja tal- “lealta’”.

Lejn min għandhom ikunu leali l-Membri tal-Parlament?

Kif nifhimha jiena l-lealta’ tal-Membru Parlamentari dejjem hi lejn dak li jemmen. Li jkun konsistenti miegħu nnifsu u ma dak li tiddettalu l-kuxjenza tiegħu. Imbagħad wara tiġġudika l-istorja.

Hekk għamel il-Membru Parlamentari Għawdxi Kurunat Attard fl-ewwel seduta tal-Parlament fi Frar 1962 meta qasam il-Kamra u abbanduna l-Partit Demokratiku Nazzjonalista (ta’ Herbert Ganado) u ngħaqad mal-PN ta’ Ġorġ Borg Olivier. Bil-vot tiegħu Borg Olivier fil-Gvern kellu 26 vot minn 50. Mingħajru kellu 25. Mingħajr il-vot ta’ Kurunat Attard il-Gvern seta’ kellu diffikulta anke’ dwar il-kisba tal-Indipendenza ta’ Malta. Wara li qasam il-Kamra Kurunat Attard baqa’ jitla’ fil-Parlament elezzjoni wara l-oħra sal-1987 meta ħadet postu fil-Parlament bintu Giovanna Debono. L-istorja tat il-ġudizzju tagħha.

Hekk ukoll għamel Alfred Baldacchino li qasam il-Kamra fl-1974 meta telaq il-PN u ngħaqad mal-Labour. Bil-vot tiegħu il-Gvern Laburista immexxi minn Dom Mintoff kellu 29 vot. Mingħajru kellu 28 minn 55 u ma setax jemenda l-Kostituzzjoni li kif kienet dakinnhar kienet teħtieġ 29 vot favur biex tkun emendata. (L-Ispeaker għalkemm ma kellux vot kien jgħodd bħala membru tal-Kamra. Għalhekk il-maġġoranza rikjesta għall-emendi Kostituzzjonali kienet ta’ nofs 56 li jigi 29. Illum l-Ispeaker m’għadux jingħadd!)

Ġorġ Borg Olivier laqa’ lill-Kurunat Attard fil-PN. Ma qallux biex ikun leali lejn il-votant u jmur lura fil-Partit Demokratiku Nazzjonalista. Anke Dom Mintoff laqa’ lil Alfred Baldacchino: ma qallux ikun leali lejn il-votanti u jmur lura fil-PN!

Il-lealta’ kif definita fil-Parlament dejjem kienet waħda tal-lastku! Min iġebbed l-iżjed! Kif jaqbel fil-mument.

Il-lealta’ tal-Membru Parlamentari lejn dak li jemmen għandha twasslu biex isostni l-programm elettorali li hu intrabat miegħu waqt il-kampanja elettorali. Huwa dan l-għodda li bih il-Membru Parlamentari jgħarbel lill-Gvern fil-ħidma tiegħu fil-Parlament. Inkluż meta l-Kabinett innifsu jiddevja mill-programm elettorali jew ifittex li jagħmel affarijiet li jkunu inaccettabbli.

Il-Membru Parlamentari huwa obbligat li japoġġa l-programm politiku tal-Partit li f’ismu ġie elett imma għandu ukoll l-obbligu li ma jkunx servili. Il-lealta’ tiegħu m’hiex inkondizzjonata. Irid jimxi m’għajnejh miftuħin beraħ, b’leħen kritiku.

F’dan il-kuntest il-vot ta’ sfiduċja hu miżura estrema li jkun ġustifikat li jintuża biss jekk il-bibien jingħalqu u ma jħallux lill-Membru Parlamentari jagħmel xogħolu.

(darba oħra 3: Il-ġarra ġejja w sejra)

Lenti fuq ir-rewwixta : 1) Il-karrotti

carmelcacopardo — Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:49:46 +0000

Ir-rewwixta li għaddejja bħalissa fil-Parlament fil-fehma tiegħi taf il-bidu tagħha lir-rwol sekondarju li għandu l-backbench fuq in-naħa tal-Gvern.

Kellna diversi membri parlamentari li kienu kritiċi tal-Gvern tul din il-leġislatura, b’kull wieħed minnhom iżid id-doża. Jesmond Mugliette, Jean Pierre Farrugia, Robert Arrigo, Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando u dan l-aħħar xhur Franco Debono. Ftit li xejn kien hemm komuni bejniethom. Ilkoll ġejjin minn distretti differenti. Kuntrarjament għal li jiġri fil-Parlament ta’ diversi pajjiżi Ewropej jidher li ma kien hemm l-ebda koordinazzjoni bejniethom. Kulħadd ħadem għal rasu. Li ħadmu flimkien ir-riżultati kienu jkunu differenti u iżjed posittivi.

L-ewwel riflessjoni hi dwar ir-rwol tal-backbench. Tradizzjonalment dan kien meqjus bħala il-qaddej fidil tal-front bench, iħejji ruħu sa ma jingħoġob biżżejjed biex jieħu promozzjoni ħalli jkun jista’ jservi lit-tmexxija.

Il-ħolqien tal-grad ta’ Assistent Parlamentari, l-ekwivalenti tal-Parliamentary Private Secretary fil-House of Commons, jiena nqiesu f’din id-direzzjoni. Karrotta u sarima fl-istess ħin tant li kien hemm min ma aċċettax il-ħatra ta’ Assistent Parlamentari.

Karrotti oħra li tqassmu kienu postijiet eżekuttivi bħalma huma c-Chairmanship ta’ Kunsill tax-Xjenza u t-Teknoloġija u c-Chairmanship tal-Kumitat Konsultattiv dwar l-Industrija tal-Bini.

Dan kollu huwa aljenazzjoni mill-funzjoni vera tal-membri parlamentari li hi li jissorveljaw il-ħidma tal-Gvern billi kontinwament jitolbuh jagħti kont ta’ egħmilu.

Dak li għamlu Mugliette, Farrugia, Arrigo, Pullicino Orlando u Debono. Setgħu għamluh aħjar, imma jekk iħarsu lejn il-ħidma ta’ dawk li ġew qabilhom ftit li xejn isibu x’jispirhom.

Ir-rewwixta qegħdet il-pedament għal backbench attiv li jirrifjuta li joqgħod kwiet, bil-karrotti jew mingħajrhom.

(darba oħra : 2. Il-lealta’)

Parties in cahoots with squatters

carmelcacopardo — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:58:17 +0000

Earlier this month, the Malta Environment and Planning Authority’s environment and planning commission, which deals with applications outside the development zone, turned down an application by Enemalta Corporation for the construction of a substation at L-Aħrax in the limits of Mellieħa. The planning directorate itself had recommended the refusal of this application.

This substation aimed at reinforcing the supply of electricity in L-Aħrax tal-Mellieħa with Enemalta effectively posting the message that the crime of taking over public property does pay.

While Alternattiva Demokratika and seven environmental NGOs opposed this application, both the Labour Party and the Nationalist Party have not uttered one single word on Enemalta’s attempt at ensuring that the squatters are adequately supplied with electricity. Clearly, the PN and the PL think that being silent is essential in view of their commitments to purchase votes through squatters taking over public property.

The PL and the PN have not taken up the challenge spelt out by the greens to go public on their position relative to the illegal development of boathouses at L-Aħrax tal-Mellieħa, that is at Armier, Little Armier and It-Torri l-Abjad.

During the Mepa reform exercise, the Prime Minister repeatedly emphasised that “ODZ is ODZ”, meaning that no development will be authorised or permitted outside the development zone unless really necessary.

Dr Gonzi tried to convey the message that his safe pair of hands would ensure that abusive development would now grind to a halt. Yet, on the eve of the 2008 general election, Dr Gonzi participated in secret meetings with the illegal boathouse lobby which considers that its members have some god-given right over the public land that they have taken hold of. The result of those meetings was a PN commitment to protect illegal development carried out before 1992 on public land.

At stake are 230 tumoli of land (26 hectares), which, since way back in 2003, on the eve of another election, the PN-led government had agreed to transfer to the squatters’ holding company, Armier Developments Limited. The agreement between the government and the squatters’ holding company indicates a lease for 65 years against payment of €366,000 per annum. To date, this agreement has not been submitted for Parliament’s approval in terms of the Disposal of Government Land Act.

The squatters also expected the PL to protect their illegal constructions, which agreement was forthcoming. The newsletter Il-Bajja, published by the squatters, in October 2007 had referred to a meeting with the then Leader of the Opposition, Alfred Sant. It said that he had promised to honour an earlier agreement with the squatters, which was entered into way back in 2002.

As far as is known, Joseph Muscat has not repudiated Labour’s agreement with the squatters.

During this legislature, Minister Jason Azzopardi has embarked on a crusade of evicting squatters from public property including clearing squares and pavements of encroachments by restaurants and open air cafés. His staff members were meticulous in ensuring that an extra chair or table not covered by a permit was removed forthwith.

While noting and acting on the odd chair or table, Dr Azzopardi has turned the Nelson’s eye to the large-scale use of public land by the squatters at L-Aħrax tal-Mellieha. In so doing, he has applied the policy of being strong with the weak and weak with the strong.

Former Minister Michael Falzon wrote in an article entitled They Never Heard Of Jason Azzopardi (Malta Today, February 15, 2009) that he (Mr Falzon) was not supported by his Cabinet colleagues when, as the minister responsible for land use planning, he tried to clean up the Mellieħa boathouse mess. He was left “to burn my fingers alone, nay, my palms, arms and body. The lack of support from my then Cabinet colleagues – let alone the then backbench – was overwhelming. I could almost hear them chant: ‘Burn, Michael, burn!’”

It is clear that the PN is committed to supporting the illegal development on public land. By being silent on the issue, Labour too supports the PN’s stand without any reservations.

This is the new politics of Labour and the PN: being in cahoots with the squatters in order to exchange votes for public land, which they have occupied illegally for years. It is an issue on which PL and PN policies converge!

The environmental NGOs campaigning for a resolution of the illegal development at L-Aħrax tal-Mellieħa undoubtedly understand that there is only one way through which the land used by the squatters is restored and returned to public ownership and use. This can only be achieved through the election of green members of Parliament. The others are committed to supporting the squatters as they have been doing throughout the years.

There is no other way. If you seek real change, voting green is the only option. The others are compromised.

published in The Times on Saturday January 21, 2012

Ħawwadni ħa nifhem

carmelcacopardo — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 05:36:34 +0000

Iktar ma nisma’ lil Franco Debono jitkellem huwa dejjem iktar ċar li filwaqt li għandu raġun fuq diversi affarijiet għażel l-għodda żbaljata.

Huwa fl-opinjoni tiegħi żbaljat li jagħżel li jwaqqa’ Gvern minħabba li ma jaqbilx mar-reshuffle li għamel Lawrence Gonzi. Mhux Franco biss għandu l-fehma li hemm Ministri li mhux posthom fil-Kabinett. U din la hi l-ewwel darba li ġrat u naħseb l-anqas l-aħħar darba.

L-għodda addattata għal dan hu l-kritika tal-ħidma żbaljata ta’ uħud mill-Ministri. Imma mbagħad il-kritika trid tkun waħda konsistenti. Ma jagħmilx sens Franco li tikkritika l-ħidma ta’ Austin Gatt imbagħad tastjeni fuq mozzjoni ta’ sfiduċja dwaru. Li dakinnhar ivvutajt biex ikun sfiduċjat Austin Gatt kont tkun korrett u l-azzjoni tiegħek kienet tkun waħda proporzjonata.

Dwar il-€500 fil-ġimgħa inti ukoll korrett. Imma anke hawn għażilt li timxi b’mod żbaljat. Meta l-kollega tiegħek Jean Pierre Farrugia kien kritiku tad-deċiżjoni tal-Kabinett kien waħdu fil-kritika kostruttiva li għamel. Li tkun kritiku ta’ din il-miżura sena wara naħseb li hu opportunistku

Its time to halt the process

carmelcacopardo — Sat, 31 Dec 2011 09:20:14 +0000

The objective of a census is to collect data to accurately inform decision-makers. The 2005 census identified 53,136 vacant properties in the Maltese islands; 24,295 units (45.7 per cent) of these were flats and penthouses, 13,872 were terraced houses and 9,857 were maisonettes. Most were identified as being in either a good state of repair or else as requiring only minimum repairs in order to be habitable.

It also resulted that 5,724 units (10.8 per cent) of the vacant dwellings were in a shell state. Twenty per cent of the vacant dwellings were identified as summer residences, a substantial number in Gozo.

Comparing the 2005 census with that taken in 1995, one notes that the number of vacant dwellings in the 10-year period increased from 35,723 to 53,136, up 48.74 per cent. Faced with such an increase in vacant dwellings a responsible government would have applied the brakes to the construction of residential units. In particular, it would have either reduced the land available for development or, as a minimum, it would have retained the status quo.

Faced with this information the Nationalist government, a few months after the 2005 census, ignored the results and instead increased the land available for development. It did this through three specific measures.

Firstly, through the rationalisation exercise it extended the limits of development in most localities. Secondly, it increased the permissible heights for development in a number of localities. Thirdly, it changed the rules for the development of penthouses. Instead of being constructed over a four-storey high building they could now be constructed over a three-storey building.

This has resulted in a further increase in the number of vacant dwellings, which have now been estimated as being in excess of 70,000. The results of the latest census are awaited with trepidation.

The 2005 census had identified that there were a total of 192,314 residential units on the Maltese islands. This means that the 53,136 vacant dwellings then identified amounted to 27.63 per cent of the housing stock.

The number of vacant residential properties in Malta and Gozo in 2005 was equivalent to seven times the size of Birkirkara, which, then, had 7,613 residential units. The number of vacant residential properties in 2011 is estimated to be even larger: nine times the size of 2005 Birkirkara.

This means that today approximately one third of the existing dwellings in Malta are vacant. Additionally, it signifies that expenditure for the development and maintenance of part of the islands’ infrastructure (currently servicing vacant properties) could have been avoided and instead channelled to maintain the infrastructure that services utilised properties. This applies to roads, public sewers and the networks distributing/servicing electricity, water, street lighting and telecommunications.

Millions of euros have been thrown down the drain to keep the construction industry happy.

In view of the above, when the construction industry boasts of its contribution to the gross national product one is justified in being sceptical. When a contribution to the economic development of the country is manifested in such negative results (thousands of vacant dwellings) one starts to question whether the GNP is in reality an adequate means of measurement.

The present crisis facing the construction industry is a unique opportunity for the government to embark on its inevitable and long overdue restructuring. The large number of vacant dwellings is the proverbial writing on the wall that does not require any special deciphering skills. The construction industry should be cut down to size in order to avoid further environmental damage and to channel part of its labour force towards activity of tangible benefit to the economy.

Restructuring will lead to a migration of jobs, especially those that do not require any particular skill. Offering retraining now to the unskilled segment would be an appropriate policy initiative. This would ease the social impacts of restructuring and facilitate the migration from one sector o another.

Now is the time to halt the development of uncommitted land. In particular, the rationalisation exercise of 2006, the relaxation of permissible building heights and penthouse regulations require immediate reversal.

A positive signal was forthcoming from the 2012 Budget through the introduction of incentives for the rehabilitation of village cores and protected buildings.

These incentives were first mentioned when the Rent Reform White Paper was launched in the summer of 2008. Unfortunately, the gestation period of this initiative was of elephantine proportions.

The availability of incentives to encourage the rehabilitation of the historic heritage in towns and villages is not enough. It must be coupled with an increased commitment to train on a continuous basis the required tradesmen and women who need to be at the forefront of this effort. The industrialisation of the construction industry over the years has been the cause of the loss of much skilled labour. It is time to halt the process.

This is the way forward. The economy has been toxically dependent on the construction industry for far too long. I look forward to the time when all this would be history.

A Happy New Year to all.

originally published in The Times of Malta – December 31, 2011

9 ghost towns in Malta

carmelcacopardo — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:21:00 +0000

Malta has nine ghost towns each of them being equivalent in size to B’Kara.

I made this statement when addressing an environmental conference organised by the Church Environment Commission on Friday afternoon at Floriana.

The 2005 census had identified 53,000 vacant properties. It is estimated that the current census would identify a substantial larger number which would be well above 70,000.

The Census is intended to aid policy makers by providing information relevant to their decision-making. Unfortunately when the 2005 Census was concluded Government ignored the information available. The 2005 Census had identified that in the 10 years leading to 2005 vacant properties had increased by 17,413. Yet Government went on to increase substantially land available for developement through three specific measures. This was done notwithstanding that there was a large amount of vacant property.

The three measures through which additional land was released for development were :

1) the extension of the development zones through the rationalisation exercise,

2) the increase in the permissible height of development in various localities.

3) the relaxation of the height at which a penthouse can be constructed. A penthouse can now be constructed when the maximum permissible height is three floors. This was previously permissible when the permissible height was four floors.

When faced by such a quantity of vacant property it does not make sense to encourage more building construction through a relaxation of land use policy. Government’s land use planning policy has resulted in more than 70,000 vacant properties. These are the equivalent to 9 ghost towns each of which is the size of B’Kara.

The full text of the delivered address which was delivered in Maltese is the following :

_______________________________________________________________________

Kummissjoni Interdjoċesana Ambjent

Konferenza dwar ir-riżorsi u l-iżvilupp sostenibbli

Biżżejjed għal kulħadd ?

minnCarmelCacopardo

kelliemi ta’ Alternattiva Demokratika

dwar l-Iżvilupp Sostenibbli u l-Intern

Tajjeb li nibda bil-frażi “biżżejjed għal kulħadd” li jeħtieġ li tkun iċċarata ftit. Il-kliem kif imqiegħed jinftiehem illi dak li hawn madwarna qiegħed hemm biex naqsmuh bejnietna. Għalhekk meta jingħad li hawn “biżżejjed għal kulħadd” speċi qed jingħad li m’hemmx għalfejn tinkwieta għax sehemek tista’ tieħdu inti ukoll.

Naħseb li dan hu mod żbaljat kif infissru l-iżvilupp sostenibbli. Għax dak li hawn madwarna la hu tagħna u l-anqas ma hu għalina biss. Xi darba forsi nifhmu li aħna l-bnedmin ma nippossjedux id-dinja iżda qegħdin hawn u niffurmaw parti minn eko-sistema. Aħna parti minn xi ħaġa ikbar: m’aħniex waħedna. Hawn ħlejjaq oħra madwarna. Xi wħud mill-bnedmin għarfu dan u irrikonoxxew li aħna parti minn familja kbira li fiha hemm ukoll ħuna x-xemx, oħtna l-qamar u ħlejjaq oħra. Dawn huma sentimenti li ma ġewx espressi biss minn persunaġġi reliġjużi bħal San Franġisk t’Assisi iżda insibuhom fl-egħruq tal-komunitajiet indiġeni imxerrda mal-erbat irjieħ tad-dinja.

Sfortunatament id-dinja żviluppat b’mod differenti minn hekk għax il-bniedem fittex li jaħtaf u jiddomina kemm fuq il-bnedmin kif ukoll fuq in-natura. U n-natura li issa xebgħet bdiet tirritalja u bil-ħerba li qed tnissel permezz tal-bidla fil-klima qegħda tkaxkar minn nofs kull ma issib. Jeħel ma rasha kulħadd, mhux biss min ħarbat.

L-iżvilupp jista’ jkun sostenibbli meta nifhmu dan kollu u naġixxu fuqu. Hu sostenibbli meta nifhmu li hemm limiti li l-eko-sistema timponi (li l-ebda Gvern ma jista’ jeżentak minnhom) u li meta dawn il-limiti jinqabżu hemm il-konsegwenzi mhux biss għalik iżda għal kulħadd fuq firxa ta’ żmien. L-iżvilupp hu sostenibbli meta l-bniedem jimxi b’rispett lejn kull ma hemm madwaru: rispett kemm lejn in-natura kif ukoll lejn il-bnedmin l-oħra. Għandna l-obbligu ukoll li nirrispettaw il-ħidma ta’ ħaddieħor. Obbligu li jimmanifesta ruħu fil-mod kif il-bniedem jorganizza l-ħidma tiegħu (l-ekonomija) kif ukoll fil-mod kif in-natura torganizza l-ħidma tagħha f’dak li nsejħu l-habitats naturali. L-ekonomija tal-bniedem m’hiex iktar importanti mill-ekonomija tan-natura. Jekk inħalluhom iżda jistgħu jimxu id f’id.

Uħud jitkellmu fuq bilanċ bejn l-ekonomija, l-ambjent u l-politika soċjali biex juru kemm fehmu u li huma fuq quddiem nett fit-triq tal-iżvilupp sostenibbli. Min jitkellem fuq dan il-bilanċ immaġinarja għadu ma fehem xejn. Il-qerda ambjentali li issir kontinwament f’isem dak li jissejjaħ żvilupp ma tista’ qatt titqies ġustifikata mit-tkabbir ekonomiku. Ekonomija li tikber b’dan il-mod m’għandniex bżonnha.

Dan iġibni għas-suġġett tal-lum. Il-bini ta’ madwarna.

Qed jingħad li hawn biżżejjed għal kulħadd. Iżda waqt li hawn eluf ta’ units residenzjali vojta hawn ftit iktar minn 2,000 persuna reġistrati mal-Awtorita’ tad-Djar għax m’għandhomx saqaf diċenti fuq rashom. Ma dawn l-2000 persuna hemm oħrajn li qatgħu qalbhom mis-sistema u ma jfittxux l-għajnuna. Dan hu qasam li fih il-politika falliet għax filwaqt li ntqal minnkollox biex jiġġustifika bini bl-adoċċ fl-erbat irjieħ ta’ Malta u Għawdex għandna ammont kbir ta’ bini li hu vojt. Iżda xorta għandna soċjeta’ li m’hiex kapaċi tipprovdi għad-dgħajjef.

Iċ-ċensiment tal-2005 kien identifika il-fuq minn 53,000 post vojt. Iċ-ċensiment li għaddej bħalissa ser jidentifika numru ferm ikbar ta’ postijiet vojt, numru li uħud qed ibassru li ser jaqbeż sew is-70,000.

Iċ-ċensiment isir biex tinġabar l-informazzjoni li iktar tard tista’ tkun ta’ għajnuna lill-awtoritajiet biex jieħdu deċiżonijiet li jkunu meħtieġa. Sfortunatament meta sar iċ-ċensiment tal-2005 il-Gvern ma tax każ tal-informazzjoni li inġabret.

Ħa nispjega ftit.

Iċ-ċensiment tal-2005 wera li l-propjetajiet vojta kienu jammontaw għal 53,136 Mhux biss. Iżda ċ-ċensiment wera ukoll li matul l-għaxar snin 1995-2005 il-propjetajiet vojta kienu żdiedu minn 35,723 għal 53,136. Minkejja din iż-żieda ta’ 17,413 propjeta’ vojta fis-suq fuq perjodu ta’ 10 snin il-Gvern 9 xhur wara ċ-ċensiment kompla jillaxka l-politika tiegħu dwar l-ippjanar għall- użu tal-art bi tlett miżuri partikolari.

L-ewwel estenda ż-żoni ta’ żvilupp billi żied ammont konsiderevoli ta’ artijiet bil-politika ta’ razzjonalizzazzjoni taż-żoni ta’ żvilupp. It-tieni fil-Pjani Lokali approvati f’Awissu 2006 estenda l-għoli permssibli f’diversi żoni residenzjali. It-tielet illaxka r-regoli dwar il-bini tal-penthouses billi ppermetta li dawn ikunu jistgħu jinbnew ukoll fejn l-għoli permissibli hu ta’ tlett sulari (b’żieda mat-tlett sulari) flok kif kien qabel f’zoni fejn l-għoli permissibli kien ta’ erba’ sulari.

F’sitwazzjoni fejn il-propjetajiet vojta żdiedu b’medja ta’ 1,800 propjeta fis-sena ma jagħmilx sens li tinkoragixxi iktar bini.

Il-bini vojt fl-2005 kien jikkonsisti primarjament fi flats u penthouses (24,295 – 45.7%). Kien hemm ukoll 13,872 terraced house u 9,857 maisonette. Il-parti l-kbira minn din il-propjeta’ kienet jew fi stat tajjeb ta’ manutenzjoni inkella kienet tirrikjedi ftit li xejn tiswija.

5,724 (10.8%) mill-postijiet vojta kienu għadhom fi stat ta’ ġebel u saqaf.

Il-posizzjoni illum hi agħar milli kienet fiċ-ċensiment ta’ sitt snin ilu. L-industrija tal-kostruzzjoni hi konxja minn dan u fil-fatt naqsu l-ammont ta’ applikazzjonijiet għal permessi ta’ żvilupp kif ukoll per konsegwenza naqsu n-numru ta’ permessi li qed jinħarġu.

Il-kriżi li qed tiffaċċja l-industrija tal-kostruzzjoni toffri l-opportunita’ lil din l-istess industrija biex tirristruttura ruħha. Huwa l-mument li tieqaf tibni art verġni jew twaqqa’ l-bini u tiżviluppah mill-ġdid iżda b’mod iktar intensiv. Hu meħtieġ li l-industrija titfa ħarsitha lejn ir-riabilitazzjoni ta’ bini qadim u r-riġenerazzjoni tal-ibliet u l-irħula tagħna. L-iskemi imħabbra mill-Gvern fl-aħħar budget huma fid-direzzjoni tajba, iżda għandhom jitqiesu biss bħala l-bidu. Biex dan isir hemm ħtieġa ta’ taħriġ fis-snajja li bħala riżultat tal-industrializzazzjoni tal-kostruzzjoni intilfu jew naqsu konsiderevolment.

Din hi l-isfida. Li inħarsu l-art li baqgħalna flimkien mal-bini qadim. B’madwar 70,000 post vojt ftit li xejn hemm ħtieġa ta’ bini ġdid fis-snin li ġejjin. Huwa neċessarju li nużaw aħjar dak li għandna.

Hemm bżonn inċentivi biex il-bini vojt ikun utilizzat. Hemm bżonn li nifhmu ukoll li l-bini li jinżamm vojt jitfa piż fuq l-infrastruttura tal-pajjiż. Meta wieħed iqis li fl-2005 kien hawn ftit iktar minn192,000 unit residenzjali dan ifisser li 70,000 post vojt ifissru li l-ispejjes għat-toroq, elettriku, ilma u drenaġġ għal bejn kwart u terz tal-pajjiż huma spejjes moħlija li faċilment setgħu ntużaw biex itejbu l-infrastruttura tal-bqija tal-pajjiż.

Meta wieħed iqies li miċ-ċensiment tal-2005 jirriżulta li f’B’Kara kien hemm 7,613 propjeta’ residenzjali ifisser illi bil-propjeta’ vojta li hawn illum qiesu għandna 9 lokalitajiet daqs B’Kara vojta (speċi ta’ ghost towns). U biex inbnew dawn il-propjetajiet vojta ġiet sagrifikata raba’ u ġonna ta’ propjeta qadima fl-ibliet u l-irħula tagħna li kienu jservu bħala l-pulmun tagħhom.

L-isfida tal-pajjiż hi waħda kbira. L-ewwel li ma nistgħux nibqgħu nibnu iżjed art. It-tieni li r-riżorsi umani fl-industrija tal-bini (hemm madwar 11,000 ruħ li l-impieg tagħhom jiddependiminn din l-industrija) jkunu iħarrġa. It-taħriġ huwa meħtieg kemm għal xogħol fl-indutrija innifisha kif ukoll biex tkun iffaċilitata l-migrazzjoni għal xogħol ieħor. Dan hu inevitabbli jekk l-industrija tal-kostruzzjoni tirridimensjona ruħha għall-ħtiġjiet reali tal-pajjiż. Huwa hekk biss li naqbdu t-triq tal-iżvilupp sostenibbli, meta inħarsu fil-bogħod u nippjanaw b’mod li dak li nagħmlu illum ma jkunx biss ta’ ġid għalina illum iżda jservi ukoll biex il-ġenerazzjonjiet ta’ għada jkollhom huma ukoll il-possibilta li jippjanaw ħalli jilqgħu għall-isfidi l-ġodda li huma ukoll ser ikollhom.

S’issa bħala pajjiż ġejna naqgħu u nqumu minn għada. Inkunu bdejna nimxu l-quddiem meta nibdew inħarsu fit-tul u nibdew nagħtu importanza lill-għada daqs kemm nagħtu importanza lil illum.

9 ta’Diċembru 2011

Exercise in Practical Democracy

carmelcacopardo — Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:29:58 +0000

One of the two themes that the Rio+20 summit, to be held next June, will be focusing on will be the institutional framework for sustainable development.

In his report entitled Objectives And Themes Of The United Nations Conference On Sustainable Development, UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon discusses institution building at all levels ranging from the local to the international. The objective, he emphasises, is to integrate policymaking and implementation.

He goes on to state that on a national level the integration challenge has been responded to by the creation of new institutions (such as national councils), in many cases with disappointing results. Malta is one such case. The institutional framework for sustainable development in Malta has so far not been able to deliver.

The government will soon be in its final year in office in this legislature and, so far, all it has achieved is the demolition of sustainable development institutions.

The National Commission for Sustainable Development was disbanded at the same time that the President of the Republic was delivering the Speech from the Throne during this Parliament’s first sitting held on May 10, 2008. The President, on behalf of the government, had then declared that the government’s plans and actions will be underpinned by sustainable development. When taking decisions today, we were told, the government will give serious consideration to tomorrow’s generations.

In addition to disbanding the National Commission for Sustainable Development, the government ignored the provisions of the National Strategy for Sustainable Development, which Cabinet had approved on the eve of the 2008 general election. This strategy, which was the result of extensive consultations with civil society, laid down not only the targets to be achieved but also the structures to be set up in each ministry in order to proceed with its implementation.

All the deadlines laid down in the National Sustainable Development strategy were ignored by the government.

On the eve of another general election, the government has now presented proposals for a Sustainable Development Bill. This is intended to mainstream sustainable development across the workings of government.

The Bill seeks to create structures within the Office of the Prime Minister and the various ministries to take ownership of the National Sustainable Development Strategy.

The Bill confirms the abolition of the national commission and in its stead proposes the creation of a network made up of eight persons, these being a mix of public officers and representatives of civil society.

The national commission was much larger and had the advantage of being composed of a wider cross section of civil society together with representatives of all the ministries.

While I understand that the government’s objective in creating the network is to facilitate efficiency I submit that this is not incompatible with retaining the national commission, which, through its extensive reach, was and can still be an effective sounding board where the politics of sustainable development is moulded.

It has to be borne in mind that sustainable development is also an exercise in practical democracy whereby policy is formed through capillarity, rising from the roots of society, and not through filtration by dripping from the top downwards.

For sustainable development to take root, the strategy leading to sustainability must be owned by civil society, which must be in the driving seat of the process. The Bill goes on to draw on the National Sustainable Development Strategy by reproducing the implementation structures that the strategy had determined.

During the month of August, on behalf of the Greens in Malta, I had the opportunity to discuss the Bill with Parliamentary Secretary Mario de Marco who was carrying out a consultation exercise. During our meeting, I suggested the creation of a Guardian for Future Generations as part of the institution building for sustainable development.

I am pleased to note that the proposal of the Greens was taken on board by the government even if in a different format from that intended.

The Bill provides for the creation of a commission to be known as the Guardian for Future Generations, which is to be made up of a president appointed by the Prime Minister and three other members hailing from environmental NGOs, business fora and social and community NGOs.

The Guardian for Future Generations will be assigned extensive duties related to sustainable development, ranging from sustainable development advocacy across national policymaking to encouraging NGOs and the private sector to participate in sustainable development initiatives.

Given the functions and role of the Guardian I think that it would be more appropriate and effective if instead of a commission it is just one person appointed by the Head of State rather than by the Prime Minister.

My participation in the consultation process was another opportunity through which the Greens in Malta have contributed positively to the formation of policy and initiatives.

The Greens are always available for cooperation in initiatives of this nature. We sincerely hope that the publication of the Bill indicates that government intends to act soon because we have been waiting for far too long.

published in The Times- December 10, 2011

Gimmicks tal-Labour dwar l-enerġija

carmelcacopardo — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 09:33:24 +0000

Meta l-Partit Laburitsta ideċieda li jaddotta l-proposta tal-kumpanija Sargas kien qed iqarraq.

Hu ovvju li meta s-Sargas qed tgħid li l-elettriku tista’ tipproduċieh b’7c5 dan hu prezz iħis hafna u attraenti. L-onesta politika iżda kienet titlob li wieħed jeżamina x’hemm iktar li qiegħed jinżamm moħbi b’din il-proposta.

Meta rappreżentanti tas-Sargas għamlu preżetazzjoni f’Lukanda lokali huma emfasizzaw li dan il-prezz ta’ 7c5 huwa l-prezz ta “raw energy”. Jiġifieri kemm tiġi tiswa’ l-enerija ġġenerata. Komplew jemfasizaw illi dan il-prezz ma jinkludix l-arrangamenti li jkun meħtieġ li jaslu għalhom dwar l-impjant innifsu. Għax l-impjant (il-power station) tkun trid jew tinkera inkella tinxtara. Din hi stamat li tkun tiswa bejn €800 u €900 miljun.

Dan il-prezz ta’ 7c5 l-anqas ma jinkudi l-ispejjes konnessi mal-Carbon Capture Technology li biha s-Sargas qed jgħidu li jrid jiġbru l-carbon dioxide u jesporatawh. Apparti l-fatt li din it-teknoloġija għad m’hiex sviluppata biżżejjed, din mhux biss tiswa l-flus iżda tikkonsma ukoll l-enerġija : bejn 25% u 40% tal-enerġija ġġenerata.

Meta wieħed jgħodd dan kollu l-prezz tal-enerġija bil-proposta ta’ Sargas li magħha jaqbel il-Partit Laburista ta’ Joseph Muscat ikun wieħed għoli ħafna iktar milli qed jgħidu.

Imma l-Partit Laburista jibqa’ għaddej bil-gimmicks.

L-aħħar ħaġa. Jekk l-enerġija tkun ġġenerata bl-impjant tas-Sargas xi ħadd irid jispjega x’ser jiġri mill-ħaddiema tal-Enemalta li preżentme jaħdmu fuq il-ġenerazzjoni tal-elettriku. Għax l-Enemalta bi-proposta tal-Labour ma jkolliex bżonnhom iktar!

Gwardjan għal Ġenerazzjonijiet Futuri

carmelcacopardo — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:49:47 +0000

Il-Gvern għadu kif ippubblika abbozz ta’ liġi dwar l-iżvilupp sostenibbli imsejjaħ Att biex jintegra l-iżvilupp sostenibbli fil-ħidma tal-Gvern, biex titqajjem kuxjenza dwar kwistjonijiet u prattiċi ta’ żvilupp sostenibbli fis-soċjeta’ kif ukoll biex jippromwovi l-adozzjoni tal-istess. Dan l-abbozz kien ippubblikat fil-Gazzetta tal-Gvern ta’ nhar it-Tlieta 22 ta’ Novembru 2011.

Il-proposta originali dwar Gwardjan għal Ġenerazzjonijiet Futuri saret minn Malta fi żmien li kien Minisru tal-Affarijiet Baranin Guido de Marco. Din saret fil-kuntest tal-Konferenza ta’ Rio de Janeiro f’Ġunju 1992.

Meta Mario de Marco Segretarju Parlamentari fl-Uffiċċju tal-Prim Ministru responsabbli mill-Iżvilupp Sostenibbli ddiskuta miegħi l-proposti li kien ser iressaq il-Gvern jiena għan-nom ta’AD issuġġerejtlu li kien il-waqt li jinħoloq il-Gwardjan tal-Ġenerazzjonijiet Futuri fil-Liġi Maltija biex dak li qed ngħidu lill-barranin li hu tajjeb għalihom napplikawh għalina.

Li l-Gvern addotta l-proposta tiegħi, li jiena ppreżentajt għan-nom ta’ AD, hu ta’ sodisfazzjoni. Avolja jiena kelli f’moħħi responsabiltajiet ftit differenti minn dak li qed ipproponi l-Gvern.

Pero’ hu f’waqtu li nirrikonoxxi li sar pass tajjeb. Li forsi jkun sviluppat iktar il-quddiem.